JSC appeals High Court ruling on handling petitions against judges
National
By
David Njaaga
| Dec 24, 2025
The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) has filed an appeal against a High Court ruling, it says, constraining its constitutional mandate to handle petitions seeking the removal of judges.
In a statement dated Wednesday, December 24, the Commission said it respects the authority and independence of the courts but disagrees with parts of the judgment delivered in Constitutional Petition No. E110 of 2025.
“The Judicial Service Commission hereby confirms that it has filed an appeal against the said judgment,” noted Secretary Winfridah Mokaya.
The case centres on how the Commission exercises its powers under Article 168 of the Constitution of Kenya, which sets out the process for receiving and considering petitions for the removal of judges of the superior courts.
READ MORE
Kenya ranks poorly in digital quality of life and AI development as Finland, US top
Why December menus decide Africa's tourism future
KPA introduces new tariffs at Mombasa and Lamu ports
Why motorbikes lead in Kenya's innovation journey
Making agriculture 'cool' again: How to win the youth back into big farming
Financier ups competition with 100,000 handset financings in four months
Farm that sees further: Foresight chooses feathers over cattle horns
Why travel insurance could come in handy this long holiday season
Why gaming platforms more vulnerable to scams
How tech innovation is boosting access to insurance products
The Commission said Articles 171 and 172 of the Constitution of Kenya mandate it to safeguard judicial independence while advancing accountability, a balance it described as central to Kenya’s constitutional order.
While acknowledging the courts’ decisional independence, the Commission stated that the judgment limits its ability to discharge its duties as outlined in the Constitution.
“This step is taken in the public interest and for the purpose of obtaining guidance on the proper interpretation and application of Article 168 of the Constitution in relation to the Commission’s mandate,” added Mokaya.
The Commission assured the public and the Judiciary that it will continue to carry out its responsibilities with independence and fidelity to the Constitution, while pursuing lawful avenues when dissatisfied with a court decision.