Marriott faces backlash over its luxurious safari camp in Mara
Rift Valley
By
George Sayagie
| Jul 29, 2025
Marriott International has been given 14 days to release all legal, environmental, and community-related documents concerning its upcoming Ritz-Carlton Maasai Mara Safari Camp.
Failure to comply may result in legal and diplomatic escalation, according to a letter from community elders to the owners of the new facility.
This call was outlined in a letter dated July 24 from Meitamei Ololdapash, a land rights advocate and conservationist.
The demand has sparked backlash against what is perceived as one of the most controversial tourism developments in Kenya’s recent history.
READ MORE
Insurers now warm up to health cover for the elderly
Why Kenya's affordable housing push must prioritise security, comfort
Food, energy price hikes yield higher inflation in July, says KNBS
Why insurance could be the game-changer for your small business in times of crisis
KenGen starts geothermal exploration in Tanzania's Mbeya region
Acorn reports Sh457 million half-year profit
EABL posts Sh12b profits, to give Sh8 dividend
Court gags faction of wrangling Directline shareholders over shares sale
Nairobi protests Tanzania's new rules on traders
Microsoft valuation surges above $4 trillion as AI lifts stocks
“Failure to respond promptly and comprehensively will lead to an escalation of our advocacy efforts, legal actions, and international media outreach,” Dr Ololdapash warned in his letter addressed to Marriott President and CEO Anthony Capuano.
The luxury hotel is set to open on August 15, 2025, with the 14-day deadline expiring on August 7. This date could significantly impact the project’s future and Marriott’s global reputation.
The hotel’s location has become the focal point of the controversy as it is allegedly situated at Sand River, a protected wildlife corridor that serves as a crucial crossing point for the Great Wildebeest Migration.
This corridor links Kenya’s Maasai Mara National Reserve to Tanzania’s Serengeti National Park.
Ololdapash, who leads the Maasai Education, Research, and Conservation (MERC) Institute, is demanding that Marriott provides land lease agreements, title documents, environmental approvals from the National Environment Management Authority and a Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA).
“The company must also furnish evidence of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) from local Maasai communities, corporate sustainability and compliance documentation, and details on public grievance and redress mechanisms,” he added.
The Ritz-Carlton Safari Camp, reportedly charging between $3,500 (Sh451,000) and $26,000 (Sh3.3 million) per person per night, is marketed as a premium wilderness escape.
It features 21 luxury tented suites, wellness facilities, and private game drives all positioned in a region known for its biodiversity and ongoing controversy.
According to the MERC Institute and several conservation experts, the hotel is being constructed without community consent, lacks environmental transparency, and alters the natural terrain, potentially endangering wildlife.
“This is not merely a local issue; it is a global scandal,” Ololdapash stated.
“Marriott must be held accountable for violating environmental laws and neglecting indigenous rights.”
Ololdapash revealed that a lawsuit has been filed in the Environment and Land Court, naming Narok County officials and regulatory agencies as respondents.
This legal action aims to halt further development and evaluate the project’s compliance with Kenya’s Environmental Management and Coordination Act (EMCA, 1999).
Social media campaigns using the hashtag #SaveSandRiver have garnered global support, with activists urging tourists to boycott the hotel and other Marriott properties across East Africa.
At the time of going to press, Marriott had not publicly responded to the allegations or the formal request for disclosures.
Maasai Mara Chief Park Warden Stephen Ole Minis defended the construction of the Ritz-Carlton resort at the Sand River crossing, asserting that the project complied with all necessary conservation, environmental, and legal standards prior to its approval.
“This development was neither rushed nor concealed,” Minis stated in a phone interview.